Archive for July, 2012

The Patient Is Getting Worse

July 31, 2012

 

There is an old Chinese curse that translates to: “may you live to see interesting times.” Interesting indeed as there is no precedent for the environment investors face today. None of the many difficulties the world economy faces are brand new. What’s new is the decidedly distasteful stew being served as all of the troubles are put in the cauldron together as never before. With rolling recessions across the globe there is the justifiable fear that the recent “Great Recession” will turn into the next “Great Depression”. What are the flash points that could bring this perfect storm together? Let’s hit them one by one.

Europe

Much of Europe is in a dire solvency crisis brought on by the bursting of real estate bubbles across much of the developed world back in 2007. That bubble hit a particularly raw nerve because of the relationship between real estate loans, leveraged bank balance sheets and government deficits. When the bubble burst it caused two things to happen. First, banks had to take heavy losses. Second, a severe global recession ensued. As a result governments were faced with declining revenues and a collapsing financial system. They decided to save the banks by nationalizing their losses. The decision to save the banks rather than put them into receivership was critical because it tied the countries’ fortunes to the banks, an unbelievable gift to the bankers at taxpayer expense. The result? Some of the countries are now insolvent too.

The European Central Bank (ECB) and policy makers have thus far treated this as a liquidity crisis in an effort to buy time. But the downward spiral continues as governments pile up excessive debts to bail out troubled banks and in turn rely on the troubled banks to buy the government’s excessive debt. Charles Ponzi would be proud. It’s quite rational to believe that this situation will not end well. One clue is the interest rates spike in the “PIIGS” countries: Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece & Spain. Nobel laureate Milton Friedman was famously skeptical that the European monetary union could not survive its first shock because the only way out of such a downward spiral is to hit overdrive on the printing press. The PIIGS do not have the ability to do that and a rolling recession, if not a depression, continues.

Greece is the canary in the coal mine. The combination of fiscal austerity and skyrocketing interest rates has ground their economy to a halt as they are in their fifth year of recession. Across the Eurozone six countries are in technical recession and unemployment stands at 11.1%, the highest since the project was launched in 1999. In Spain unemployment is 24.6% (52.1% among the youth). The Europeans and the IMF have put together ~€600bln, which could be enough to bail out Spain. But Italy, whose bond yields are also spiking and is in recession, would blow the doors off the whole enterprise.

If it seems like it could not get any worse then consider that the solution to these problems are not monetary or fiscal, they are political. The fundamental question is: are the strong countries like Germany willing to save the common currency by making massive transfers of sovereign wealth to weaker countries in exchange for the weaker countries ceding sovereign fiscal authority to Brussels. Each party will either make that hard choice or accept the painful consequences of a breakup. Because of this problem’s political nature it is unlikely to reach any resolution without a crisis the severity of which we have not yet seen. The clock is ticking.

Emerging Markets

If only the European troubles could happen in a vacuum then the rest of the world might march merrily on. However, the European financial system is the primary financier of emerging markets and deeply interconnected with those economies. Additionally, European consumers are a major market for goods manufactured in the emerging world. This double whammy has begun to cause economic slowdowns in the developing economies that have been the growth engine of the world over the past three years. China, Brazil and India have all slashed interest rates in an effort to have a “soft landing”, code for modest declines in GDP growth rates. Leading indicators are beginning to suggest that those efforts are not working.

United States

“No, gentlemen, we have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work.” – U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr., 1939

Our economic recovery since the “Great Recession” has been weak by historical standards. Now, due to global recessionary pressures, high systemic leverage and uncertainty about the proper role and size of government we may be on the edge of another recession. Recent economic gains of winter have proved illusory, driven by weather related factors that are not sustainable. The Federal Reserve, famous for being late to every party, recently lowered its 2012 growth forecast from between 2.4% ‐ 2.9% to 1.9% ‐ 2.4% and extended its latest round of monetary stimulus beyond its original expiration date. Although the Fed has been creative and energetic in its efforts to combat the risks to economic growth, it can do little more to combat the problems we face.

What we can do in the U.S. is move away from a fiscal policy that has thus far been a fantastic failure. Spending growth has far outpaced revenue growth through both Republican and Democratic White Houses and Congresses. The “Fiscal Cliff” of expiring Bush tax cuts, payroll tax cuts, new health care reform taxes and spending cuts may well push the economy over the edge. Although it is much more likely that policy makers will punt for another year than let us go over the cliff, the point is useful to demonstrate that if prudent reform is not taken soon then we will confront our own debt crisis as various entitlements explode governmental obligations.

The preponderance of historical economic data suggests that spending is the problem. Contrary to Keynesian orthodoxy that presumes government spending has a multiplier of greater than 1 (which is to say that $1 spent by the government creates more than $1 of economic activity), the reality is quite different and that multiplier is likely much closer to zero. Sadly, therefore, the short term benefit from spending is dwarfed by the destabilizing effect of a large debt burden and the negative corollary effects on long term GDP growth. In this way spending is like a drug: it produces a short term benefit but exacerbates a long term problem. Japan is a worrisome example of this as they have experienced 23 years of anemic economic growth pockmarked by regular recessions.

Debt problems cannot be cured with more debt, as Europe ably demonstrates. Few would disagree that we are on an unsustainable path. At some point we will reform or the bond market will make borrowing prohibitively expensive. The danger of playing chicken with the bond market is that much of our debt is short term and needs to be refinanced regularly. If interest rates climb precipitously it would only be a short time before the interest expense dwarfed any other budgetary line item. A downward cycle of debt and economic decline would quickly ensue.

Opportunities & Risks

Because I want to end  on a happy note, I’ll start with the risks this time. Broadly speaking the U.S. equity market does not provide the margin of safety needed to be bullish. At 14, the price/earnings multiple of the S&P 500 is neither cheap nor expensive. Furthermore, corporate profitability is at unsustainably high levels due to corporations’ lack of investment and hiring, and hoarding cash. These high earnings levels serve to make the market look cheaper than it actually is. In order for earnings to grow global GDP growth needs to come back. With all the headwinds out there it seems that risks remain tilted to the downside.

However, markets never distribute their gains or their pains equally. There are opportunities out there where the panic is already priced in. Energy is a good example. The long term global imbalance between supply and demand, broad based currency devaluations, low multiples and high dividend yields make this sector and others like it fertile hunting territory.

Suffice it to say that this is a very difficult time to be managing money. We can expect the roller coaster to continue until Europe and the United States makes progress on their issues. From a portfolio perspective, be heavy in cash so that you can mitigate any major portfolio declines, take advantage of opportunities and live to fight another day. Remember that it is better to get ahead by not falling behind.

Brennan R. Redmond, CFA
Vice President
Brighton Securities

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.)

Work Cited

Boll, Sven. “Imagining the Unthinkable: The Disastrous Consequences of a Euro Crash.”

Cox, Jeff. “Despite Gains, This is the ‘Weakest Recovery Ever’: Rosenberg.” 

Grantham, Jeremy. “US Stocks are Expensive and Bonds are Disgusting.”

Hoisington, Van R. & Hunt, Lacy H. Ph.D. “Quarterly Review and Outlook First Quarter 2012.”

Hussman, John P. “Release the Kraken.”

Hussman, John P. “A Brief Primer on the European Crissis.”

Rodriguez, Bob. “Caution: Danger Ahead.”

 

Jargon, Big Words, and Wasting Your Time

July 27, 2012

“We are going to allocate your portfolio in such a way to minimize your downside risk while still maintaining strong cash inflows with the potential for capital appreciation.”

Did you get all of that?  I’m the one who wrote it, and I’m still not convinced!

Now, let’s try again.

“Our goal is to give you a plan to provide you with income and growth, while trying to minimize the risk that comes along with any investment.”

Better?

It is very easy for financial advisors to fall back on jargon and big words that we think make us sound smarter in front of our clients.  Truth is it does nothing except confuse and even intimidate.

When I worked at 13WHAM, my goal was to always “say it simple.”  Instead of talking about the Buffalo Bills lack of an edge rusher and lack of size in a 3-4 defensive front, isn’t it easier to just say the Bills defense can’t sack the quarterback enough?  Wit and wisdom are wonderful things, but when nobody understands what you’re saying, their time was just wasted.

The goal is the same as a Financial Advisor.  Whether you are planning for retirement, your child’s education, or starting a new life with your husband or wife.  To help you understand how to best achieve your goals in order to give you peace of mind and confidence that you’re on the right track.  That way, when we walk out the door, you’re excited to get started, not scratching your head wondering, “what did he just say?”

Chuck Wade

Chuck Wade

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

Where to Get Income in a Sideways or Rising Interest Rate Environment

July 24, 2012

Interest rates in the U.S. are at all-time lows, and investors are likely on borrowed time if they are positioned in bonds or bond funds.  Market volatility has pushed investors, in many cases, too far into fixed income vehicles.  As bond prices move inversely to the direction of interest rates, the eventual rise in interest rates will cause what are typically considered “safe” investments to decline in value.  Until rates rise, we remain in a sideways, low interest rate environment, where it is difficult to find a steady stream of relatively high income.  The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury was 1.44% on July 23rd-a new all-time low.  Many retirees are banking on being able to minimally achieve a 4-6% total return on their investment portfolios in order to maintain their standard of living and their principle.  So the question is, where do you go for relative safety, if fixed income yields are at all-time lows and future rate increases will likely lower the value of your bond portfolio?

One answer that may make sense for your portfolio is preferred stocks.  Preferred stocks are hybrid stock-bond vehicles that are typically issued at a par price of $25 and trade like a stock, but that have some of the features of a bond.  They have a maturity date, typically long term (ie-25 years).  They often are “callable”, meaning the issuer has included a provision that will let them redeem the stock (thus paying off that high interest rate debt) and return the par price for every share that you own, at a certain date(s).  These shares typically trade in a relatively narrow range and have a high dividend (frequently 5-8%). As they are a hybrid bond instrument, they are obligated to pay you the interest on the stock, and in the event of a bankruptcy you would be paid your money back before the common stock holders.  One strategy is to look for preferred stocks that are trading at a discount to their par value, for instance under $25 per share.  When they mature or are called (at par) you have a capital gain, on top of the interest rate that you received during the time you held the stock – a win-win scenario.

For advice specific to your portfolio and your situation, please feel free to contact me at 585-340-2229 for a complimentary review.  Thank you.

Susie L. Light
Financial Advisor

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

A Difference of Opinion

July 23, 2012

There is no more common thing in any market: for every share of stock, for every bond, every option, for everything that someone sells, someone else buys.  It is the ultimate difference of opinion: one person wants something enough to buy it while another thinks they’re better off without that same thing. Experienced market participants take this in stride. After all, we know that when we buy or sell, we could be the one on the wrong side of the transaction.  In an industry where opinions differ to the point of a buy or a sell, I understand that somewhere close to half of the universe of investment professionals disagrees with me at any moment.  My colleagues and competitors know this too – it comes with the territory.

Yesterday, business editor Steve Sink of the Democrat & Chronicle published an article about the Eastman Kodak bankruptcy that mentions two scenarios for Kodak stockholders: a bonanza or a bust. In an illustration of the yawning chasm that sometimes separates opinions in the financial world, a California-based analyst claims that Kodak shareholders could see $10/share if the patent auction is successful. On the other side is my prediction that common shareholder will be wiped out in the bankruptcy.

Then I received this:

Not content with lecturing me via e-mail, Mr. Luskin also left voicemails for me and for my assistant in which he not-so-patiently explains that he knows “the facts” and will share them with me if I call. He also mentions that he “do(es) this for a living” by which I suppose he means investment analysis and not making crank calls on Sunday mornings.  I agree with Mr. Luskin that facts are important, so let’s take a look at a recent fact. Last week Kodak proposed paying its senior management bonuses if the company emerges from bankruptcy and pays off creditors.  Writing for USA Today, Rochester-based reporter Matt Daneman notes that CEO Antonio Perez gets a $2 million bonus if creditors get back 30 cents on the dollar.  It’s a fact that a 30% recovery for creditors leaves little room for shareholders to get anything.  Other important facts are that Kodak owes far more than it can pay for pension obligations, among other debts.  If the patent sale goes well, Kodak’s position would improve. But today’s news casts the sale in a difficult light.

Regardless of my opinion or anyone else’s, Kodak’s bankruptcy will be done in less than 12 months.  We’ll know then how everything turns out, and whether shareholders walk away with wealth or lament their losses. Stay tuned.

GTC

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

Another “Are You Kidding Me?”

July 12, 2012

So please let me think out loud here, I need to try and get this Eastman Kodak situation straight.  Mr. Antonio Perez was named as President and CEO in 2005 (he was named President in 2003) at which time the company had revenue of about $14.5 billion.  Currently the revenue is about $5.6 billion.  So roughly 1/3 of the revenue and in bankruptcy. The organizational change  here is that many of the same management team that was at the helm prior to and when Eastman Kodak filed bankruptcy, has for the second time in 6 months reorganized its structure and according to Mr. Perez, the CEO, this new organizational chart is the best structure to effectively lead Kodak out of the bankruptcy and toward a new profitable and sustainable business for the future. If my memory serves me, I seem to remember a similar statement when they split the company into 2 businesses earlier this year.  There’s an old cliché about the Titanic and deck chairs that comes to…..oh never mind.

Is it just me or does it feel like Mr. Perez may be making this up on the fly?  The old structure has been in place for merely 6 months.  Furthermore, it occurs to me if you were the same person in charge when the company entered bankruptcy you really have an uphill battle trying to convince investors and the public that you are the right person to lead the company out of bankruptcy.

Moving along now to the management team’s entitlement to a bonus for leading the company out of bankruptcy. WOW!!!!   Where do I even begin with this?  Let me try and be diplomatic.  I certainly question the logic of paying bonuses to the same management team that brought you into bankruptcy for bringing you out of it.  Talk about your “heads I win, tails you lose” scenarios.   From a personal standpoint, I find it shameful that anyone in this management teams position would even consider themselves entitled to any type of bonus after the level of compensation they were already paid for the failures leading up to the bankruptcy filing.  But like I said, that’s just me.

Doug Hendee, CFP®

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

“LIE”BOR

July 6, 2012

LIBOR is the London Interbank Offered Rate.  It is the average interest rate estimated by leading banks in London that they would be charged if borrowing from other banks. It also effects many adjustable rate mortgages and very importantly it is used to price trillions of dollars in notional value of derivatives.

Barclays Chief Executive Bob Diamond resigned on Tuesday.  Barclays’ management has come under scrutiny since the bank was fined $453 million last week by U.S. and British regulators for submitting false reports on interbank borrowing rates between 2005 and 2009. Much of that activity originated from traders in Barclays Capital, the investment banking division which Diamond headed at the time.

“Either you were complicit, grossly negligent or incompetent”  John Mann, a Labour lawmaker, told Mr. Diamond.  After a pause Mr. Diamond asked “Is there a question?”  From yesterday morning’s WSJ.  No Bob, there is no question – apparently Mr. Mann felt like stating the facts.  Not a lot of wiggle room when those are your options.

It certainly is interesting, right around Independence Day in the states, to see just how parallel the banking industry in the UK and in the United States run to each other.  My sense is we are just beginning to witness the train wreck in how arbitrary the loan rates that banks would charge each other in and around the financial crisis were set.  I would say  “much more art than science.”

Just one more in the hits that just keep coming out of the banking industry.  Boy it really doesn’t instill a tremendous amount of confidence in the guys at the top making the ‘hard’ decisions…. oh and by the way, a tremendous amount of money in compensation for themselves either.

Doug Hendee, CFP®

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).


%d bloggers like this: