Archive for the ‘Current News’ Category

$1,600,000,000 (that’s billion with a ‘b’)!!!

March 22, 2012

Oh, it’s still missing!?  The $1.6 billion dollars that “vaporized” from MF Global!?  Let me refresh everyone’s memory as, apparently, a fairly significant “vaporization of capital” warrants only brief news coverage because we have much more urgent things to cover like “The Situation,” whoever that is,  heading to rehab.  MF Global mixed its clients’ money with its own and, now that MF Global is in bankruptcy, a bunch of that client money has disappeared.  Important and newsworthy idea?  Of course it… wait, nevermind, the Kardashians just came on.

So now what is proposed is a new “Corzine Rule.”   Mr. Corzine, the former governor of New Jersey, former Goldman Sachs head and more terrifying,  potential FOMC Chairman, was the president of MF Global when said funds were “vaporized”.  The proposal would make it mandatory for a futures firm’s principal to sign off on any money moved from client  segregated funds if it is more than 25% of the firms excess segregated funds. Now, call me crazy here, but I think that the first person to approve the funds being moved should be the client.  In  the MF Global case this didn’t happen.  I am also of the understanding that at a future’s fund, much like at a brokerage firm, comingling client funds and firm funds is illegal!  So, in the case of MF Global, what the firm did was already illegal?  But we’re considering a new law to make it doubly illegal!? Really??

Let me get this straight.  Jon Corzine is still not in jail nor is he charged with anything, the $1.6 billion is nowhere to be found and we are proposing a new rule which at its core addresses something that is already illegal.  Wow.  Anyone think a new law enforced as weakly as the old laws will change anything!?

Is it any wonder that average people look at what is going on in the financial industry and just shake their heads in disbelief?  It’s my industry and that’s precisely what I have been doing for 4 years now.  Where has the idea of client service gone?  Where has the idea gone that our single purpose as professional financial advisors is to serve our clients?   Actually enforcing the laws we have would go a long way toward pushing people like Corzine, whose self-interest trumped his committment to his clients, out of the business.

We don’t need a new law; we need to return to the idea that we work for our clients

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

Doug Hendee, CFP®

Update: Apple as an Income Stock

March 19, 2012

In my previous post I discussed the potential of Apple becoming an income stock. Today the company announced that it would begin paying a $2.65 quarterly dividend, a current yield of about 1.8%. Along with the dividend Apple plans to buy back $10 billion of its stock. I believe returning capital to the shareholders is the right move for Apple. They will retain more than enough cash to continue research & development as well as any acquisitions the company might seek. The shareholders are the owners of the company and if management is not putting this excess cash to work, it should return it. As I mentioned in my previous post, a dividend will make for an interesting dynamic as the company now fits the bill for funds/investors who seek current income from their investments. Apple is up nearly 50% year-to-date. I will be interested to see the effects of this fundamental change as time goes on.

Sam DiNorma

 (This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

Kodak’s Apple Problem is Apple’s Kodak Problem

March 9, 2012

So, why is today’s American technology behemoth trying so hard to beat the tar out of yesterday’s?  The longer answer has to do with competition, technology, and imaging, but in the end only the short answer matters: money.  Both Kodak and Apple think they own the same very lucrative idea and they want the matter settled so that they can continue (or in Kodak’s case, start again at) making money.

Yesterday, Judge Allan Gropper ruled that he would not “unfreeze” the lawsuit Apple has brought against Kodak over patent infringement.  Since Apple thinks it owns one of those patents, it would prefer to get a court ruling saying so before the patents get sold as it will be more difficult for Apple to regain the rights to that patent if they get sold to a third party.  Yesterday made that a whole lot harder.

How does this matter to Rochester?  The patent sale is an enormous factor in Kodak’s ability to fund its pension, the Kodak Retirement Income Plan or KRIP.  Let’s look at some numbers:

KRIP is funded at either 86% (PBGC) or 90.5% (Kodak’s 10-K), depending on who you want to believe.  That leaves the dollar amount of the underfunding at either 700 million or 500 million.  Let’s split the difference and call it 600 million.  Estimates of the value of the patent portfolio Kodak wants to sell range from 2.2 billion – 2.6 billion.  Before Kodak can make up the funding gap, it has to pay back the DIP loan it got to get it through the first part of bankruptcy: 950 million.  Still waiting after DIP and the pension are 2.6 billion in bondholder debt and a pile of unpaid vendors and some environmental remediation.  But what will Kodak have left to pay them?

$2,000,000,000 (Patents) – $950,000,000 (DIP) – $600,000,000 (Pension) = $450,000,000. 

That’s 450 million left over to pay back 2.6 billion + of debt and have enough money to keep operating a business!

Now, bankruptcy is going to reduce the bondholder, vendor and environmental debt (and reduce retiree benefits outside of KRIP) to some degree and Kodak has other valuable assets to try to sell (profitable business lines, real estate).  But if you take a moment and think about how much worse a situation Kodak will be in if they don’t sell those patents – that is, if that 2 billion dollars is not available to pay off the DIP, pension and some other debts – you will understand just how critical the patent sale is to Kodak and to Kodak’s retirees.

Yesterday’s decision takes Kodak a step closer to being able to sell those patents.  Hopefully, this is a pattern that continues.

Chris Cromwell

WSJ on the Topic: http://on.wsj.com/yNB8w8

History Repeats (or at least rhymes)

March 8, 2012

Investors often use historical comparisons to help gauge expectations on their investments.  While this is a useful practice, history is full of time periods that have little in common with one another.  If we look at the returns of a balanced portfolio (60% stocks / 40% bonds) from the years 1900 through 2010, the inflation adjusted returns were roughly 4%.  However, there were long periods of booms and busts.  There were the post war booms in the 1920’s and 1950’s, as well as the deregulation / declining interest rate boom in the 1980’s and 1990’s.  On the other hand there were painfully long bust periods such as the war decades and the Great Depression.  My point is that some time periods were better than others.  So it helps to focus on the time periods during which the overall economic environment is similar to what we are experiencing today to get a better understanding of what we might expect.  Consider the following features of today’s economic environment:

It was Mark Twain who famously said that “History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”  And so it is true today as the points above were also uniquely prevalent during the 1970’s.  Unfortunately the 70’s were one of the long bust periods.  But there were investments that did relatively well.  So, when you are looking to the past to help inform your current decisions and expectations, pay extra special attention the 1970’s.  It may help you navigate today’s stormy seas.

Brennan R. Redmond, CFA
Vice President
Brighton Securities

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp. The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).

Rumors and Trust, A Lesson From Kodak

March 6, 2012

I tell a lot of people about websites like Snopes.com.  For those who don’t know, Snopes and sites like it provide a resource for checking out the veracity of those pesky emails about things like bacterial onions, NPR’s annual imminent defunding, or the laptop you can win by forwarding an email to 8 friends (all UNTRUE, by the way).  Rumors are easy – easy to believe, easy to pass on, easy to be scared by.  The worst ones inspire us to quick, limited-thinking action.  When that action is forwarding an email there’s little harm done (aside from a few pestered friends), but when that action is changing an investment, it can be a dangerous thing.

The first rumors that spread through Rochester over Kodak’s (at the time) imminent bankruptcy had to do with SIP, Kodak’s 401(k) plan.  Some financial firms spread word that SIP assets might be frozen, or that a wave of redemptions would depress SIP values. Those notions were completely implausible and turned to be equally untrue.  But perhaps their thinking went like this: “Let’s scare them out of SIP and into a roll-over IRA with our firm.”  I don’t know if that worked or not, but I do know it’s not how we do business.  We think that your relationship to your advisor should be based on trust, that you should be presented with choices, and that advice should be tailored to your individual circumstances.  I also know that folks who work at Kodak are both smart and skeptical – two good qualities when considering the professionals you hire in your life (attorneys, financial advisors, accountants).

Rumors swirled about Kodak and we did our best to put those rumors to rest on our blog and in our community meetings.  Rumors about Kodak are sure to continue to spread.  There’s more information available since Kodak has filed and court documents are accessible, but we’re sure the rumors are not done.  So, use us as a local ‘Snopes’ for Kodak news.  Heard a rumor?  Call, email, tweet or stop by and see us to find out if it’s true.

585.473.3590
1703 Monroe Avenue (near 12 Corners)
http://www.brightonsecurities.com
@chris_crom
@gtconboy

Chris Cromwell

Kodak Seeks to Reduce Retiree Health Care

February 27, 2012

Kodak has announced that it intends to seek to cut some retiree health care benefits at the omnibus hearing in its bankruptcy court proceedings on March 20, 2012.  The reduction of health care benefits has been an expected result of Kodak’s Ch. 11 filing.  Their intention as stated in the letter below is to continue health care benefits for those not yet 65 and not eligible for Medicare and for those who retired before 1991. 

Here are some of our firm’s thoughts on this motion:

  • Everyone in Rochester, everyone watching Kodak, has known that retiree health care was very likely to go.
  • This is earlier than expected in the bankruptcy process, but it also preserves a bridge of coverage to Medicare for many retirees – this is better than most expected!
  • One of the most at-risk groups – retirees under the age of 65 – has been saved from the health care axe.  For now.
  • Notice will have to be given after the court either approves or denies the motion on March 20 – at the earliest, health care changes should be around mid-May.
  • Pre-1991 retirees not affected by this motion; the contract for pre-1991 retirees is harder to walk away from.

And here is the letter from Kodak: 

February 27, 2012

Dear Kodak Retiree, LTD Recipient or Survivor:

Eastman Kodak Company and its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 reorganization on January 19, 2012 with the following objectives:

  • To enhance the Company’s liquidity position in order to maintain the confidence of and relationships with our vendors, suppliers, and customers;
  • To spur the monetization of the Company’s valuable intellectual property and fully enforce our intellectual property rights against industry participants that have infringed our proven and valuable digital imaging patents;
  • To fairly apportion our legacy costs for a company of the size we are today; and
  • To maximize the value of the Kodak enterprise for all of our stakeholders by reorganizing around our commercial and consumer business units.

Among the legacy costs that must be addressed as part of our reorganization are retiree health care costs that are not borne by many of the companies we compete against in the marketplace.  As we have changed these benefits over time, we have always tried to balance the needs of our retirees with the needs of the Company.  It is now clearer than ever that in order to remain a participant in the market tomorrow, we must put Kodak on a sustainable financial path today.  

You are receiving the enclosed legal motion because there is an important hearing scheduled on March 20, 2012, at which time the U.S. Bankruptcy Court will consider a planned change in Kodak retiree medical coverage that we believe will affect you.  This letter summarizes the proposed change, which we believe represents a necessary step in Kodak’s efforts to become a competitive and sustainable enterprise during and after its Chapter 11 reorganization process.  We urge you to read the entire legal motion enclosed with this letter and to consult an attorney with any questions you may have. 

The motion filed by the Company would discontinue retiree benefits under Kodak’s medical plan (defined in the motion as “Medicare Enhanced Benefits”) for the following individuals who have attained age 65 (regardless of Medicare eligibility) or are under age 65 and Medicare eligible:

  • Former employees who retired on or after October 1, 1991;
  • Former employees who became eligible for long-term disability benefits on or after October 1, 1991;
  • Current employees who are retirement eligible when they leave the Company; and
  • Survivors and dependents of these individuals.

A hearing to consider the motion is scheduled to occur in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (located at One Bowling Green, New York, New York 10004) on March 20, 2012.  Pending approval of the Bankruptcy Court, this change will become effective on May 1, 2012.

Our ultimate objective is to preserve a set of retiree benefits that are most critical to our retiree population and which would be difficult to replace.  Preserving these most critical benefits must be accomplished within the bounds of affordability for the Kodak that will emerge from Chapter 11.  As such, this proposed change to retiree medical benefits represents one important step in an ongoing process to address Kodak’s legacy costs and enable the Company to move toward a more sustainable path. 

We understand that this change will be difficult. However, individuals affected by this change who have Medicare coverage will continue to be covered by Medicare, and will typically have access to a variety of other insurance options available in their community to supplement their Medicare coverage.  In some cases, the costs associated with these options may be lower than what you are now paying under the Kodak plan.  All affected individuals will also have the opportunity to elect COBRA continuation coverage under the Kodak plan.  More details on COBRA coverage will be provided at a later date.

We are committed to keeping you informed throughout this process. To help us deliver timely communications to you, we need your help.  If you would like to receive such communications electronically, please go to the retiree tab of the Kodak Transforms website at www.kodaktransforms.com and look for instructions for how to subscribe to future e-mail notifications. 

We encourage you to review the Question & Answers included with this letter. If you have additional questions now or in the future, please call the retiree information hotline toll-free at (888) 249-2721, or visit www.kodaktransforms.com.

You may access a copy of motion (and accompanying notice) directly by clicking the “Information for Retiree Medical Beneficiaries” option on our claims agent’s web site at www.kccllc.net/kodak.  

Eastman Kodak Company

Enc.

All benefits information in this document is subject to applicable law and the terms of the relevant plan document, which will govern if there are any differences.  The Company reserves the right to amend or terminate any benefit plan at any time.

 Questions & Answers

 The following questions and answers have been prepared to help respond to questions you may have about this proposed change to Kodak retiree medical coverage.  Please note that the term “retirees” also includes LTD recipients, survivors and dependents.

Q.  Why is Kodak making this change to retiree medical coverage?  Will it be the only change?

A.  This change is one of many difficult but necessary decisions the Company needs to make in order to establish a financially sustainable course for the future.  Fairly managing legacy costs is one of the key objectives Kodak must achieve during its Chapter 11 reorganization in order to continue delivering value to its stakeholders in the years ahead.

Q.  I’m eligible for Medicare, but my covered dependents are not.  What happens to their coverage?

A. Kodak medical coverage for dependents who are under age 65 and not eligible for Medicare will not be affected by this change until they become age 65 or become eligible for Medicare, whichever occurs first.  As a result of this change, however, the cost of their current coverage may increase.

Q.  I’m not eligible for Medicare, but my covered dependent is.  What happens to our coverage?

A. You will continue to be covered under Kodak’s medical plan but your dependent will lose his or her coverage.

Q.  Why are retirees who reached age 65 or are on Medicare losing coverage but pre-65 retirees aren’t?

A.  We are taking this step now in light of two important realities:  1) Kodak must adopt a more competitive cost structure; and 2) those affected by this change are typically covered by Medicare and should have ready access to other options to replace this supplemental coverage.

Q.  Will I have to pay more for coverage than what I am paying today through Kodak?

A.  Not necessarily.  Many retirees with Medicare coverage will have access to insurance options that supplement their Medicare coverage with no monthly premiums that are comparable to what they have through Kodak.

Q.  I am currently not eligible for Medicare, but will be in the near future.  What will happen to my coverage when I become eligible for Medicare?

A.  Prior to becoming eligible for Medicare, you will need to enroll in Medicare Parts A & B.  Once enrolled in Parts A & B, if you want to pursue further coverage, you will need to evaluate the medical options available to you in your area. 

Q.  When will we know whether or not the court approves the motion?

A.  The hearing is scheduled for March 20, 2012.  It is difficult to determine when the Court will make its ruling, but you will be informed as soon as possible once a ruling has been made.

Q.  Where can I go to get information about insurance options to supplement my Medicare coverage?

A.  The options vary depending on where you live.  You can contact local insurance companies to find out what options are available in your area.  You can also contact the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid either by phone at 1-800-MEDICARE or go to the Medicare website at www.medicare.gov and go to the Medicare Plan Finder tool.  In order to get an accurate comparison of what you have today, you’ll need to select “Medicare Health Plans with drug coverage”. 

Q.  Is there any action that I need to take now?

A.  If you are eligible for Medicare, you can start exploring the available insurance options in your area to determine which one will best meet your needs. 

All benefits information in this document is subject to applicable law and the terms of the relevant plan document, which will govern if there are any differences.  The Company reserves the right to amend or terminate any benefit plan at any time.

# # #

Questions? Find me on twitter at @chris_crom or follow or subscribe to this blog to comment.

Chris Cromwell
Business Development Manager
Brighton Securities

Kodak Series: 5 Things To Know About KRIP (Kodak Retirement Income Plan)

February 21, 2012

We’ve had thousands of people asking us questions about KRIP.  Mostly, these questions are some form of ‘is my pension safe during Kodak’s bankruptcy?’  In this spirit, here are 5 things to know about KRIP:

  1. The Pension is Funded.  Pension funding is given by Kodak to a trust.  The trust is a separate legal entity and its monies – the pension funding – cannot be used by Kodak for corporate purposes.  It can only be distributed by the terms of the trust document.  Currently, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC) is auditing the funding level of the pension.  The last review by Kodak had the funding level at about 96%.  The PBGC has returned with a lower number – 86%.  The difference in the numbers could be caused by different methods of calculating the funding, the time difference between the two reviews, the inclusion of a subsidiary’s pension (Qualex) or a combination of any of these things. All in all, 86% is not a bad level to be at; we are currently waiting to hear more from the PBGC about the state of the Kodak pension.
  2. Any Underfunding is Likely to be Made Up by Kodak.  Kodak has stated that KRIP payments should not be affected by the bankruptcy.  Pension funding is not dismissed lightly in bankruptcy court, particularly when the company in question is sitting on so much potential value (patents, profitable business lines).  If Kodak decided it did not want to fund any shortfall in its pension, it would have to prove to the court that it cannot continue to exist without reducing or avoiding this liability.  That’s a high hurdle!
  3. The Pension is Insured.  In the unlikely event that KRIP shortfalls cannot and do not have to be paid by Kodak, the PBGC would step in to take over the pension.  The PBGC insures pensions up to a maximum amount per year (your maximum is findable in these tables) just like the FDIC insures bank accounts up to a limit (in the PBGC’s case, the limit varies based on factors like age and type of pension).  The PBGC taking over the pension will likely mean a little more hassle – extra paperwork, an estimated interim payment while the PBGC operations gather all of KRIP’s information – but it also means that pensions are much more secure.  This may help all pensioners sleep a little better at night.
  4. Lump-sum Payments May Come Back or May Not.  The lump-sum option offered by KRIP has been suspended while the PBGC audits the pension fund.  This is a legal requirement – pensions are required to enter what is called a ‘restricted period’ while they are being audited by the PBGC.  If the pension fund passes the PBGC’s test or if it fails but Kodak makes up the funding gap, the lump-sum option is likely to return.  We should know more in 2-3 months about how likely that is.  The purpose of this suspension is to provide some stability to the pension fund while the PBGC tests the funding level.
  5. You Can Decide to Take the Lump-sum Later Even If You Take the Annuity in the Restricted Period.  Those eligible for the lump-sum option may elect to take it if and when it is offered again even if they elect the annuity during the restricted period.  This is an important option as it allows those set to retire now to do so without foregoing pension cash flow and without giving up the lump-sum option should it return.  The lump-sum will be reduced by annuitized payments already made, but other than that, the lump-sum option should look the same as it did before the bankruptcy filing.

Questions? Find me on twitter at @chris_crom or follow or subscribe to this blog to comment.

Chris Cromwell
Business Development Manager
Brighton Securities

Kodak Rumors

February 16, 2012

Information cycles as Kodak moves through bankruptcy can drive us all a little wild with frustration and anxiety.  Trying to understand what will happen with Kodak is like walking through an oddly mercurial landscape that switches instantly from a desert to a lush valley and back again.  We get no information and then we are overwhelmed and then we get none…

 

First, there were rumors about SIP and KRIP and health care: SIP could be frozen!  KRIP is in danger!  Health Care will disappear tomorrow!  Kodak was tight-lipped and those rumors spread quickly.  Our firm was a good resource, providing some information that countered the rumors (SIP will not be frozen, KRIP is fairly well-funded, Health Care is likely to go but it will be a long process).

 

Then in the first hours of January 19, 2012, Kodak filed for bankruptcy and the floodgates were opened: Kodak had a website, Kodak was disseminating Q&A’s to its employees and retirees, T.RowePrice sent notice of changes within the most popular fund inside SIP.  Our role switched from the primary information source to a primary source of financial expertise and analysis.

 

Then the waters dried up again.  We waited.  We looked expectantly to yesterday’s hearing, but that ended up being more of a trickle – naming rights to a theater in CA, approval of DIP financing… small potatoes.  Still no word about pension funding, no word about health care.  So, we wait.  Again.

 

In the waiting is when the rumors start.  This morning there was a bank mix up and some folks didn’t get their paychecks deposited in their accounts.  Twitter lit up and we started getting calls – was Kodak missing payroll!?  What did that mean!?  Was this related to planned HR layoffs?  Turns out it was just a glitch – an exceedingly ill-timed one – that was worked out very quickly.

 

It’s certain there will be more real news and more rumors about Kodak and this bankruptcy.  So, what are the lessons?  Look aggressively for information, but remain a skeptic.  Find legitimate sources to confirm what you hear.  Follow this blog and find us on twitter (George Conboy here and Chris Cromwell here).  Stay tuned to local news.  We aim to continue to be a great resource for our clients and our city – If you know any other sources, share them as a comment to this blog. 

Chris Cromwell
Business Development Manager
Brighton Securities

Kodak Bankruptcy Questions – Kodak Bankruptcy Answers

February 16, 2012

We’ve spoken with thousands of Kodak employees and retirees over the past month.  In an effort to continue to be a source of useful information, expertise and opinion, we are starting a Kodak blog series today that will continue until there is nothing left to say about Kodak’s bankruptcy.

The first topic will be bankruptcy in general.

Kodak has filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 which means that the company intends to reorganize itself into a new company.  The new company will be smaller and will have likely shed some of business divisions and some of the legacy costs of the old company.  Legacy costs can include retiree benefits, pension obligations and environmental obligations.  We will cover Kodak pensions in other posts, but it’s worth noting here that Kodak has noted that it does NOT intend to abandon its pension – it intends to fund its pension.  In essence, Chapter 11 means that, though there will be some pain as parts of the business are wound down or sold, Kodak will still exist and will, hopefully, grow to be a large and successful company again.

Chapter 7 is the other kind of bankruptcy protection – the kind where the business will no longer exist in any form after the proceedings.  It is possible that down the line Kodak will file for this protection, but it seems very unlikely right now.  It’s important to remember that Kodak has many profitable business lines running, that it sits on some likely very valuable assets and that it has the potential to grow again into a large company.

Our expectation at present is that we will see a company about 50% as large as the current Kodak when it comes out of Chapter 11.

Questions? Find me on twitter at @chris_crom or follow or subscribe to this blog to comment.

Chris Cromwell
Business Development Manager
Brighton Securities

Kodak’s (Next) Day in Court

February 14, 2012

On Wednesday February 15th, Eastman Kodak’s lawyers will be back in court in Manhattan. The topic on this trip to court will be Kodak’s request to pay some of its creditors ahead of others.  This is a big deal to everyone involved in the Kodak bankruptcy. Every dollar paid to one creditor may be a dollar that can’t be paid to another. With a towering pile of IOUs and not enough cash to meet them all, everyone hoping to get paid – vendors, bondholders, retirees – has a stake in this hearing.

Kodak’s recent requests to the court suggest that they consider some creditors more equal than others. When Kodak filed for bankruptcy they listed $332 million in trade credits – money owed to vendors. Now Kodak has asked the court to pay $100 million of that in full immediately, claiming that money is owed to unidentified “critical suppliers.” Any  company that sold goods to Kodak and remains unpaid might be a part of this mysterious group; any one that isn’t will be at an immediate disadvantage.

Judge Allan Gropper has seemed willing at times to defer to bondholders – he reduced Kodak’s initial DIP financing request from $700 million to $650 million, and initially denied the company’s request to pay the critical suppliers.  But he’s also granted Kodak’s request to reduce from 2 weeks to 1 week the window for objections to Kodak’s motion that the DIP contract be kept a secret. Where he will come down tomorrow is anyone’s guess, but we expect sparks to fly at tomorrow’s meeting.

The bankruptcy process is an ebb and flow of information – at times we are flooded with news and at other times we are forced to wait for just a trickle.  Tomorrow ought to be closer to a flood.

Questions or comments? Find me on Twitter to continue the conversation.

GTC

(This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Brighton Securities Corp.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog post is for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities).


%d bloggers like this: